No safe viagra for women at the moment.

Supposedly I received an email from a colleague inviting me to visit the link
http://ampamtuqt.drugstorehealthworld.com.
Am surprised about the medicines targeted for women labeled as pink viagra.

As as service to our readers, I was browsing the site Pink pill to boost female libido eludes pharma

Here are some pertinent snippets:

The Food and Drug Administration's panel of reproductive advisers voted unanimously that the benefits of the pill from Boehringer Ingelheim did not outweigh side effects, including fatigue, depression and fainting spells.

In addition, it posted warnings on hormone replacement therapy:
Two years earlier a massive government study found that hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women increased heart disease and breast cancer, raising concerns about the safety of all hormones.

If you are relatively young, you should not concern yourself with viagra for women or even men, unless you join some orgiastic excessess. Then you will go to hell.

CAVEAT EMPTOR!

Who do you trust about Condoms: The W.H.O. or the bishops?

Src: http://www.mb.com.ph/node/249112/who-challenge

You noticed that Philippine bishops would want to feel relevant in these times by issuing statements outside their field of expertise and instead express doubts about the efficacy of condoms in preventing the spread of sexual diseases and HIV(Aids)?

OK. How many American priests and Catholic workers died of Aids?
The W.H.O. statements contents can be summarized:

the W.HO.O. statement directly contradicted bishops' recent claims that condoms are too porous and do not work in preventing the spread of infection.

Dr Massimo Ghidinelli, the WHO's regional adviser on HIV-AIDS, said the WHO statement was "intended to clarify some of these regularly returning questions and doubts about the effectiveness of condoms."

Now as for the other claim by the bishops that such distribution of free condoms contribute to the promiscuity, may we invite them to comment on the Irish and Germanic problems about priestly abuses for which the Pope, yes the Pope, was even implicated for not doing anything about guilty priests?